Economic impact of denosumab adoption in cancer patients with bone metastases or multiple myeloma from the Brazilian private healthcare system’s perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21115/JBES.v12.n1.p16-22Keywords:
cancer, metastatic breast cancer, multiple myeloma, denosumab, zoledronic acid, bone complication, skeletal related event, economic impact, private healthcare, BrazilAbstract
Objective: To estimate the cost per SRE and annual economic impact of denosumab adoption in patients with bone metastases (BM) secondary to breast cancer, prostate cancer, other solid tumors or multiple myeloma from the Brazilian private healthcare system’s perspective. Methods: An economic model was developed to compare the cost outcomes associated with denosumab instead of zoledronic acid for SRE prevention. The model included the following costs: drug, administration, monitoring and SRE management. Annual costs per 100 patients were reported in 2019 Brazilian currency (BRL). The SRE management costs (vertebral fracture (VF), non-vertebral fracture (NVF), radiation to bone (RB), surgery to bone (SB) and spinal cord compression (SCC)) were estimated from the resources and procedures collected from literature review, official database, and a Delphi panel. Data collected from randomized clinical trials related to each tumor type in the analysis and from a prospective observational study was used to estimate the clinical efficacy of denosumab vs zoledronic acid. Results: The cost per each type of SREs across all tumors ranged BRL 27,246 – BRL 28,035 for VF, BRL 18,023 – BRL 18,811 for NVF, BRL 42,750 – BRL 43,538 for RB, BRL 18,023 – BRL 18,811 for SB and BRL 12,472 – BRL 13,260 for SCC. The introduction of denosumab was estimated to result in annual savings per 100 patients of up to BRL 1,072,043.14 for breast cancer, BRL 1,212,822.79 for other solid tumors, BRL 1,929,660.67 for prostate cancer and BRL 77,965.07 for multiple myeloma. Conclusion: This analysis suggests that SREs add substantial costs to the management of patients with bone metastases. In this way, the use of denosumab would prevent and delay SREs in cancer patients and might possibly lead to reduce the economic burden associated with SREs, borne by Brazilian private healthcare payers.