Clinical and economic evidence of the use of Tachosil® for hemostasis in hepatic, pulmonary and renal surgical procedures

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical and economic benefit of TachoSil® for hemostasis in liver, lung and kidney surgery compared to conventional techniques. METHODS: A literature review was conducted looking for systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared TachoSil® to conventional techniques for hemostasis in liver, lung and kidney surgeries. A cost analysis was performed under the perspective of the Brazilian Private Healthcare System, considering costs of materials, hospitalization and blood transfusions. At the base case scenario, the resources were based on an international economic evaluation and in the alternative scenario, on the original RCTs. RESULTS: The review shows up 142 studies. Six RCTs evaluating TachoSil® in pulmonary surgery, 4 in hepatic surgery and 2 in renal surgery were selected, besides 4 systematic reviews and 2 non-randomized studies that had been considered relevant. The results of all those studies confirmed TachoSil® as a good alternative to conventional techniques. Based on the RCTs, TachoSil® might reduce the period of hospitalization after pulmonary surgery in 1.49 day (95% CI: 0.52 - 2.45), p<0.003) and in 3.00 days after hepatic surgery. The cost analysis demonstrated that, when compared to conventional techniques in base case, TachoSil® reduces the costs of lung, liver and kidney surgeries in $10,349.77, $10,686.11 and $4,677.46. In the alternative scenario the reductions might be of $2,020.09 $4,872.22 and $3,997.17 in lung, liver and renal surgeries, respectively. CON[1]CLUSIONS: The superior clinical benefit of TachoSil® when compared to conventional techniques was demonstrated in several clinical trials. The use of TachoSil® leads to cost reductions, being a cost-saving alternative (with superior efficacy and lower costs).