A practical index to support hospital sustainability

Authors

  • Luiz Fernando de Oliveira Ribas 2iM Inteligência Médica; Instituto Brasileiro de Valor em Saúde (IBRAVS).
  • Angelo da Silva Cabral 2iM Inteligência Médica.
  • Cesar Luiz Lacerda Abicalaffe 2iM Inteligência Médica; Instituto Brasileiro de Valor em Saúde (IBRAVS).

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21115/JBES.v18.p6-9

Keywords:

Item Response Theory (IRT), Critical indicators, Efficiency and Sustainability Index, Hospital performance, Health system sustainability, Diagnosis-Related Groups

Abstract

Objective: The pandemic highlighted the need to ensure the sustainability of the health system,
prompting the Brazilian company 2iM to develop new evaluation models for hospitals, doctors, and
health plan operators, using the Health Value Score. The Item Response Theory (IRT) is now presented as a new fundamental mathematical tool in hospital evaluation, allowing the identification of critical indicators and the promotion of financial and operational sustainability. Methods: The article proposes a hospital performance evaluation method based on IRT, using software that collects data on admissions, applies the APR DRG system to classify information, and generates insights for identifying key indicators such as length of stay, discharge with scheduled time, readmissions, deaths, and costs. Results: Highlighted results include a 76.50% performance in length of stay, 69.31% in discharge with scheduled time, and 75.99% in turnover. The average length of stay was 4.11 days, compared to the ideal of 2.90 days, representing a revenue opportunity of R$ 1.6 billion between 2020 and 2024. Additionally, 30.69% of discharges occurred outside the scheduled time, creating an additional revenue opportunity of R$ 474 million, considering the importance of compliance with hospital logistics. Conclusion: The Hospital Efficiency Index proved to be simple and practical in application and understanding, indicating key points of attention and review in hospital
management.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brasil. Ministério da Saúde.(2021).Manual Técnico do Sistema de Grupos de Diagnósticos Relacionados (DRG).

Busse, R., Geissler, A., Quentin, W., & Wiley, M. (Eds.) (2011). *Grupos relacionados ao diagnóstico na Europa: caminhando em direção à transparência, eficiência e qualidade nos hospitais

Fetter, RB, Shin, Y., Freeman, JL, Averill, RF, e Thompson, JD(1980). *Mistura de casos Definição de combinação de casos por grupos relacionados ao diagnóstico .

Fung V, Schmittidiel JA, Fireman B, Meer A, Thomas S, Smider N, et al. Meaningful variation in performance: a systematic review. Med Care. 2010;48:140-8.

Groene O, Skau JKH, Frølich A. An international review of projects on hospital performance assessment. Int J Qual Health Care. 2008;20:162-71.

Gerritsen M, Peet C. Aplicação da teoria de resposta ao item em cuidados de saúde: como ela pode ser usada para avaliar a qualidade em hospitais? Int J Qual Health Care. 2016;28(6):784-91.

R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2024.

Rizopoulos D. ltm: An R package for latent variable modeling and item response analysis. J Stat Softw. 2006;17:1-25.

Samejima F. The general graded response model. In: Handbook of polytomous item response theory models. New York: Routledge; 2010. p. 77-107.

Published

2026-03-24

How to Cite

Ribas, L. F. de O., Cabral, A. da S., & Abicalaffe, C. L. L. (2026). A practical index to support hospital sustainability. Jornal Brasileiro De Economia Da Saúde, 18, 6–9. https://doi.org/10.21115/JBES.v18.p6-9

Issue

Section

Artigos