Number needed to treat (NNT) and cost of preventing an event (COPE) of enzalutamide vs. abiraterone acetate plus prednisone for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients who failed androgen deprivation therapy (A

Authors

  • Stephen Stefani Instituto do Câncer Mãe de Deus, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Professor, Fundação Unimed, Porto Alegre, Brasil
  • André Sasse Centro de Evidência em Oncologia (CEVON) da Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), São Paulo, Brasil.
  • André Fay Instituto do Câncer Mãe de Deus, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Professor, Faculdade de Medicina da Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil
  • Hellen Kim Sense Company, São Paulo, Brasil.
  • Marcia Abadi Astellas Farma, Inc., São Paulo, Brasil.
  • Vanessa Teich Sense Company, São Paulo, Brasil.
  • Gilberto Lopes Grupo Oncoclínicas do Brasil, São Paulo. Universidade Johns Hopkins.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21115/JBES.v8.n2.p141-148

Keywords:

enzalutamide, abiraterone, prostatic neoplasms, number needed to treat

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to estimate the NNT and COPE of enzalutamide (ENZ) in comparison with abiraterone acetate+prednisone (AA+P) over a 12-month and 24-month period from the Supplementary Health System perspective in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients who are chemotherapy naïve (MCRPC). Methods: The NNT is calculated by the inverse of the absolute risk reduction of an intervention vs. control; additionally, COPE represents the NNT multiplied by total cost of treatment in a pre-defined period. The absolute risk of ENZ and AA+P, and their respective control treatments, were obtained from the Kaplan Meier curves for the co-primary end points of radiographic progression free survival (rPFS) and overall survival (OS) from the clinical studies PREVAIL and COU-AA-302, respectively. Mean treatment duration was estimated utilizing the area under curve (AUC) technique from the respective intervention rPFS curves. The results analyzed ENZ or AA+P versus its respective placebo at 12 and 24 months for NNT and COPE. Total treatment cost consisted of drug cost, monitoring cost and adverse event (>=1% incidence and special interest adverse events) related cost. Results: The 12 month analysis resulted in NNTOS/ENZ= 12.79; NNTrPFS/ENZ= 2.59; NNTOS/AA+P= 116.28; NNTrPFS/AA+P= 4.72 and COPEOS/ENZ= BRL 1,626,583; COPErPFS/ENZ= BRL 329,701; COPEOS/AA+P= BRL 15,144,886; COPErPFS/AA+P= BRL 614,368. For the 24-month analysis, the results were: NNTOS/ENZ= 11.00; NNTrPFS/ENZ= 3.58; NNTOS/AA+P=16.56; NNTrPFS/AA+P= 5.00 and COPEOS/ENZ= BRL 1,965,454; COPErPFS/ENZ= BRL 639,327; COPEOS/ AA+P= BRL 2,833,580; COPErPFS/AA+P= BRL 855,741. Conclusion: Across the 12- and 24-month time horizons, the NNT and COPE was favorable for ENZ vs. AA+P in patients with MCRPC.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2016-08-20

How to Cite

Stefani, S., Sasse, A., Fay, A., Kim, H., Abadi, M., Teich, V., & Lopes, G. (2016). Number needed to treat (NNT) and cost of preventing an event (COPE) of enzalutamide vs. abiraterone acetate plus prednisone for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients who failed androgen deprivation therapy (A. Jornal Brasileiro De Economia Da Saúde, 8(2), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.21115/JBES.v8.n2.p141-148

Issue

Section

Artigos